The first week of my latest graduate class, Digital Citizenship, has come and gone, and has led me to examine two main concepts: my own definition of what the term "digital citizenship" means, and the most vital elements of that citizenship.
Another school of thought, while not completely separating the
digital and non-digital worlds, does nonetheless draw a distinction
between the two; for example, Polgar and Curran, citing Ribble, declare: "Digital citizenship is the norms of
appropriate, responsible tech use" (2015). While I lean toward the "one life" perspective, I
believe that at present we are better served by continuing to highlight the
distinct citizenship challenges and questions that present themselves in the
digital world. This is not so much for the students as it is for teachers, who
may not be as naturally "plugged in" as their students are, and may
need to draw these distinctions in order to understand the world their students
are constantly navigating.
Even further from the “one life” idea, unfortunately, are the
digital citizenship concepts put forth in countless Acceptable Use Policies in school
systems across the country. As Kuropatwa points out, many times people who talk about
digital citizenship are really simply talking about what not to do online, with
no attention paid to what one should actually do and why (Brainwaves Video Anthology, 2015).
My own definition of digital
citizenship would be as follows: Digital citizenship is the set of principles
and actions that enable all people to learn and grow unimpeded. All digital
citizens (or just citizens) have the right to this growth for themselves and
the responsibility to help others achieve it as well, both by positive action
and by avoiding negative behaviors. The most fundamental principle of this
concept of citizenship is that because each individual’s success depends on
their connection to the broader community, the strength of the community must
be maintained by ensuring that all individuals have equal access to and
investment in that community.
Ribble's nine elements of digital citizenship all address this idea in some form; he cites digital access, commerce, communication, literacy, etiquette, law, rights and responsibilities, health, and security as the key components of digital citizenship (2015). To
me, however the most important elements that Ribble highlights are rights and responsibilities, access, and
communication. The sharing of information is what makes the digital world such
a powerful tool for education; equal access for all is vital to help that world
reach its full potential, and understanding one’s rights and responsibilities
in that world, as well as those of others, is an essential part of protecting and
growing that remarkable learning environment. It is these three of Ribble's elements that drive my own definition of digital citizenship, and will affect how I present this concept to my students and colleagues.
REFERENCES
The Brainwaves Video Anthology (2015, July 16). Darren Kuropatwa - Digital ethics and digital
citizenship #BLC15 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbMsbxYvr4E
Ohler, J. (2012). Digital citizenship means character education
for the digital age. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed
for Quick Review, 77(8),
14-17. (PDF: Ohler_Digital_citizenship_means_character_education_2012.pdf)
Polgar, D. R., & Curran, M. B.F.X. (2015). We
shouldn't assume people know what digital citizenship is. Retrieved from http://www.teachthought.com/technology/we-shouldnt-assume-people-know-what-digital-citizenship-is/
Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in
schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). Eugene, OR:
International Society for Technology in Education.
No comments:
Post a Comment